|
|
|
|
vehicle replacement |
| • Homepage » PEUGEOT MODELS (FAULTS AND SOLUTIONS) » 307 | |
| 08.05.2020 17:52 | # 1 |
 ak38 |
|
|
I have 2004 megane 2 1.4 car, I am generally satisfied with the car but I am considering changing it due to engine power. Recently I saw the 307s while browsing the net 2004-2005 model full (xt I think) 1.6 engine triptonic gear with sunroof rain sensor vs nice vehicle at prices like around 20-21-22. Now, my question to you is whether or not the vehicle will cause problems due to fuel consumption, spare parts and price, chronic problems, triptonic gear (every vehicle is different, but in general), please tell me about the market :) thanks in advance;)
|
|
| 08.05.2020 17:52 | # 2 |
 error |
|
|
I do not know how possible it is in Kayseri, but if you are satisfied with your vehicle, selling and buying another vehicle will cause some loss. my suggestion is to look for ways to increase the power of your existing vehicle before the option to replace the vehicle "tuning" ...
|
|
| 08.05.2020 17:52 | # 3 |
 qqyyxx |
|
|
Although it is the same class, it is better than megan in terms of comfort and handling, but the side industry of the color is more developed as a part. It is close to each other in the original parts. Since I haven't been using a gasoline vehicle for a long time, I can't say anything about fuel. Friends who use it can give ideas.
|
|
| 08.05.2020 17:52 | # 4 |
 eeccaa |
|
|
I agree with the advantages of friends. 307 1.6? If you say Megan II 1.4, I would say 307, of course. Non-fuel use costs are similar. I think your Megan is manual gear. Accordingly, if you are not bored with your vehicle or if you do not say that I should get on an emergency automatic vehicle or something, I think it will not be an economical shopping to replace it with the same vehicle or a new year. And if your only criterion for replacement is engine power, keep in mind that you won't feel a significant performance difference between the two vehicles. There will not be as much difference as he wrote on paper. On the contrary, the difference in consumption will increase noticeably. Decide with your mind that you will switch to a vehicle with 4-speed traditional automatic transmission, which is more comfortable, larger engine, heavier and the most important difference. These are not negatives of 307, the necessity of the mechanical structure, do not get it wrong.
|
|
| 08.05.2020 17:52 | # 5 |
| ak38 |
|
|
[QUOTE = eeccaa] I agree with the advantages of friends. 307 1.6? If you say Megan II 1.4, I would say 307, of course. Non-fuel use costs are similar. I think your Megan is manual gear. Accordingly, if you are not bored with your vehicle or if you do not say that I should get on an emergency automatic vehicle or something, I think it will not be an economical shopping to replace it with the same vehicle or a new year. And if your only criterion for replacement is engine power, keep in mind that you won't feel a significant performance difference between the two vehicles. There will not be as much difference as he wrote on paper. On the contrary, the difference in consumption will increase noticeably. Decide with your mind that you will switch to a vehicle with 4-speed traditional automatic transmission, which is more comfortable, larger engine, heavier and the most important difference. These are not negatives of 307, the necessity of the mechanical structure, do not get it wrong. [/ QUOTE] first of all thanks for your comment. My brother also uses 1.6 megane 2 triptonic gear dynamic, so it has the same features as the 307 that I intend to buy, although it has a triptonic and larger engine (115 hp), it burns less than my vehicle and is much better in performance. For these reasons I want to replace it with a clean 307 if I can find it.
|
|
| 08.05.2020 17:52 | # 6 |
| eeccaa |
|
|
Yes, it offers the option of manual gear selection 307. That's why the name Tiptronik is highlighted. But don't let this mislead you. Two types of automatic gears are widely used. They are real automated; They make the clutch with a torque converter. This piece costs a lot of consumption and weight. It has advantages such as non-sliding back, comfortable transitions, stable grip and mechanically generally smoother. The transmission in 307 is of this type. If I can't remember wrong, it was developed with Porsche and I haven't heard much of it. The more commonly used types are now the automated manual type. These are also called semi-automatic or robotized. Because the basis is the manual gear we know. When necessary, a computer controlled robot presses the clutch shifts gear and then releases it. For this reason, they do not burn much than the manual version and they do not remain cumbersome. The first examples of this structure were slow and prone to changes. However, this was largely overcome by double clutch and more capable electronic controls. The gearbox in Megan II is robotized. In summary, the transmission structure of the two vehicles is very different. 307 auto, Megan will not like auto.
|
|
| 08.05.2020 17:52 | # 7 |
| ak38 |
|
|
[QUOTE = eeccaa] Yes, it offers the option of manual gear selection 307. That's why the name Tiptronik is highlighted. But don't let this mislead you. Two types of automatic gears are widely used. They are real automated; They make the clutch with a torque converter. This piece costs a lot of consumption and weight. It has advantages such as non-sliding back, comfortable transitions, stable grip and mechanically generally smoother. The transmission in 307 is of this type. If I can't remember wrong, it was developed with Porsche and I haven't heard much of it. The more commonly used types are now the automated manual type. These are also called semi-automatic or robotized. Because the basis is the manual gear we know. When necessary, a computer controlled robot presses the clutch shifts gear and then releases it. For this reason, they do not burn much than the manual version and they do not remain cumbersome. The first examples of this structure were slow and prone to changes. However, this was largely overcome by double clutch and more capable electronic controls. The gearbox in Megan II is robotized. In summary, the transmission structure of the two vehicles is very different. 307 auto, Megan will not like auto. [/ QUOTE] I did not fully understand my teacher, which one are you saying well?
|
|
| 08.05.2020 17:52 | # 8 |
| eeccaa |
|
|
[QUOTE = ak38] [QUOTE = eeccaa] Yes it offers manual gear selection 307. So the name Tiptronik is highlighted. But don't let this mislead you. Two types of automatic gears are widely used. They are real automated; They make the clutch with a torque converter. This piece costs a lot of consumption and weight. It has advantages such as non-sliding back, comfortable transitions, stable grip and mechanically generally smoother. The transmission in 307 is of this type. If I can't remember wrong, it was developed with Porsche and I haven't heard much of it. The more commonly used types are now the automated manual type. These are also called semi-automatic or robotized. Because the basis is the manual gear we know. When necessary, a computer controlled robot presses the clutch shifts gear and then releases it. For this reason, they do not burn much than the manual version and they do not remain cumbersome. The first examples of this structure were slow and prone to changes. However, this was largely overcome by double clutch and more capable electronic controls. The gearbox in Megan II is robotized. In summary, the transmission structure of the two vehicles is very different. 307 auto, Megan will not like auto. [/ QUOTE] I did not fully understand my teacher, which one are you saying well? [/ QUOTE] Frankly, I think that the consumption factor is the highest in every liter of fuel, since we are the citizens of a state that has clearly robbed us . It might be better called robotization for vehicles in ours setting. The last point is putting consumption. Already, manufacturers prefer to use robotized automatic in recent years. Actually, I did not mean persistently good or bad. Because both are not bad. We will discuss and compare the pros and cons of these different transmission technologies for a long time. The important thing is to know the gear infrastructure of the automatic vehicle you will buy.
|
|
| 08.05.2020 17:52 | # 9 |
 muratoner |
|
|
You are my nurse, I can give you my car if you want.
|
|
| 08.05.2020 17:52 | # 10 |
 ismailkaya |
|
|
I think you can get manual gear 1.6 diesel or gasoline can not keep 110 on the road. These 307s are very series one single rear shock absorbers make a lot of sound.
|
|
| 08.05.2020 17:52 | # 11 |
| sense6th |
|
|
My 1.6 gasoline 2004 model xt car burns 8.5 liters with 100lt of hard use in 100 km with calm use.
|
|
| 08.05.2020 17:52 | # 12 |
| ak38 |
|
|
Friends a few days ago 1.6 xt triptonic gear I looked at a vehicle I did not like the performance, I was saying that my car is not agile, this is even slower
|
|
| 08.05.2020 17:52 | # 13 |
| ADANALI_01 |
|
|
Brother I think stay away from san peugeot ... I say wv look, go to 2005-2006 model peugeot buy golf 199 model ... I have always gotten woswosa so far now bought 206 because I bought a house, I am the second owner of the car, but the uta has not touched but peugeot is not a call I say, but better than megan ...
|
|
| 08.05.2020 17:52 | # 14 |
 endorphine |
|
|
I have been using automatic 1.6 comfort since 2010. Your friendly advice is to look at other brand models. Even the vehicle you buy will be either German or Japanese. I say stay away from the others. I sold it the next day, if I was someone who used the vehicle very much or constantly. But I manage it because I use it on weekends. If I have some possibility or find something clean, I will sell it immediately. They are right about fuel, it burns a lot. Don't regret it later. I do not know its manual as performance, but the automatic is very heavy. I would consider these and make your choice as such.
|
|
| 08.05.2020 17:52 | # 15 |
| qqyyxx |
|
 |
|