TORSION LOWER, 3.5 cm BOW

As a result of my little research, I would like to have my 3.5-inch sports spring and 1 tooth torsion lowering application on 206 vehicles. My aim is not to press the vehicle and gas. As it is now, it remains unsafe in corners even at low speeds and lies quite a bit. Does doing this increase the grip on the road? Do I need to replace the shock absorber or any other part? Does the bow work alone? I ask for help from knowledgeable friends. This is perhaps the subject I do not understand most about the car. Thank you from now

I think it will not be much different. The tire is slightly wider than the one used now, and if you do it as you say, the vehicle will collect itself, but of course the road handling is not something that can be gained with a bow, unfortunately.
samet206 2016-08-09 21:37:52

Original size 185/65/14. But now it's 175/65/14 plugged. I think the base of 195/55/15 or larger

My expectation is to let him rest assured. Of course, it is not like jumping on the road because it is only like a cut bow or a pile. Get more stable. The chassis is less flexible. I want it to hold on better.

I do not know the sedans, but the original size of the hb safes is 175/65/14. I suggest you to choose a quality sports spring. The vehicle will not be as soft as it is when you switch from 65 cheeks to 55 cheeks. , sports shock absorber, wider tread tires, tower tensioner to do roughly in the name of road holding.
samet206 2016-08-09 21:45:05

Long research, selection of quality materials and craftsmanship. Effort, labor, expense is a bit difficult and a long process. It will be better if I start with a wide base

Just as it makes comments with more knowledgeable friends, you can investigate this way what I know.

I will have a little advice for my friends who think about it.
When you handle the torsion while doing the back operations, you should definitely renew the bushes as a repair tool. You will not have to intervene for torsion shortly after the work is done.

I raised the rims to 16 ", I'm using a 45-cheek wide base, I'm not sure it should have been 205/45/16, there was really a huge difference between the originals. There's neither lying nor throwing itself, it goes into the bends.

Original size is missing from you? Does it really affect that much compared to the past?

The vehicle is now parked, with original winter tires on the original wheels (14 "di), I maximus 2016-08-09 23:22:53

Let me think about it, hodja. I'm afraid of the very thin cheek so I can use some rubber

First, you can start from torsion. When changing the torsion balls, we adjusted the setting so that the vehicle was perfectly flat. Noticeably noticeable handling. It was detected in the wind tunnel test that it had aerodynamic error in 206s. So there is engineering error in the vehicle :)

Thank you for the information given, I'll start by thinking and thinking.

As a lowered sports spring and torsion, I recommend it. There is a noticeable difference in bends. I have 16 "wheels, I use 195/45/16, only the comfort will decrease as the tire size.

I know that the 206s with the original size of 175/65/14 wear 205/40/17. It fits me well in 215/45/16. Both comfort is not much reduced. It feels like it prints better than anywhere.

[QUOTE = OguzhanKucuk61] I know that 206s with original size 175/65/14 wear 205/40/17. It fits me well in 215/45/16. Both comfort is not much reduced. It feels like it prints better than anywhere. [/ QUOTE]

The width of the tire can sometimes be more disadvantage than advantage. It would be a mistake to say that the road clearance of the 206s is short and torsion, which increases road holding as in 407.

my originals: 175/65/14 later picks: 195/45/16

What disadvantage does it give, for example, how much should we maximize?

in my opinion max. 2 "originally 14" se 16 ", 15" se 17 "