|
|
|
|
cheek size ??? |
| • Homepage » PEUGEOT MODIFIED PLATFORM » Peugeot Wheel Tire Selection | |
| 08.05.2020 14:15 | # 1 |
 BuRCaK |
|
|
I hope I can get a cvp from you to a question stuck in my head. I have 175-65-14 original 206 alloy poles and 1 tooth has been dropped from the rear torsion as in the picture, there is a 5 cm spring in front. If I wear 185-55-15 rims, my vehicle will remain the same from the ground or what change will it be? I don't want to get any closer to the ground, but it will drop from 65 to 55 on the cheek as it changes from 14 "to 15". As the cheek shrinks, the rim will grow 1 inch. I guess it doesn't matter much, but I wasn't sure.  |
|
| 08.05.2020 14:15 | # 2 |
 GokhaN |
|
|
logically 1 inc = 2.54 cm will grow a total of 2 cm will be shrunk on the cheeks |
|
| 08.05.2020 14:15 | # 3 |
| BuRCaK |
|
|
[QUOTE = GökhanGoral] as logic 1 inc = 2.54 cm will grow a total of 2 cm will be shrunk on the cheeks [/ QUOTE] so it will rise 0.54 cm. I didn't get it wrong, right?
|
|
| 08.05.2020 14:15 | # 4 |
 okan77 |
|
|
206 can look like the size you want .... They usually wear 195 45 15
|
|
| 08.05.2020 14:15 | # 5 |
| BuRCaK |
|
|
[QUOTE = okan77] 206 may look like the size you want .... They usually wear 195 45 15 [/ QUOTE] I don't understand when I say safety. Should he not hit the ground more on 45 cheeks then my brother?
|
|
| 08.05.2020 14:15 | # 6 |
 okankrgz |
|
|
I think 15 * 55 * 185 or 195 Burçak, Gökhan made the explanation with the necessary mm calculations. You may have trouble on the thin cheek. If you remember you are not accustomed, I had a thin cheek on my car, but if you ask me if you ask me + 45 there will be a little more descent
|
|
| 08.05.2020 14:15 | # 7 |
 MirakGTI |
|
|
I had a coilover in 206 and was flattened until the end of 205 45 16. Ideally 195-45-15
|
|
| 08.05.2020 14:15 | # 8 |
 individual |
|
|
The height of 175/65/14 is 58.31 cm and the rolling distance is 183.26 cm. The height of 185/55/15 is 58.45 cm and the rolling distance is 183.7 cm. The difference in height is 0.14 cm. when the tire is attached to the vehicle, this difference decreases by half, ie 0.07 cm. When calculating on the vehicle, the diameter of the tire, not its diameter, is evaluated. so 0.7mm vehicle will rise from the ground when it switches to 185/55/15. this value is 10 times smaller than the difference between a new tire and an old tire. can be used with peace of mind. The error rate in the rolling distance is 0.2%. the speed you see will make a 0.2% error, which is nothing. For 206, 195/45/15 is the wrong choice. Its height is 55.65 cm. Its rolling distance is 174.9 cm. It has 5% margin and the tire is 3 cm smaller.
|
|
| 08.05.2020 14:15 | # 9 |
 fourus_06 |
|
|
As he said in his friends, he will not notice much.
|
|
| 08.05.2020 14:15 | # 10 |
| BuRCaK |
|
|
[QUOTE = individual] The height of 175/65/14 is 58.31 cm, the rolling distance is 183.26 cm the height of 185/55/15 is 58.45 cm, the rolling distance is 183.7 cm. < div> & nbsp; the difference in height is 0.14 cm. When the tire is mounted on the vehicle, this difference is reduced by half, ie 0.07 cm. The 0.7mm vehicle will rise from the ground when it switches to 55/15. this value is 10 times smaller than the difference between a new tire and an old tire. can be used with peace of mind. & nbsp; rolling rate error rate is 0.2%. the speed you see will make 0.2% error, which is nothing. & nbsp; 206, 195/45/15 is the wrong choice. height is 55,65 cm. Its rolling distance is 174,9 cm. there is and the tire is about 3 cm smaller. & nbsp; [/ QUOTE] boss thank you I'm lit up like a bulb. As a result, I understood that 185-55-15 normal and problem-free use. tşk everyone |
|
| 08.05.2020 14:15 | # 11 |
 bugatti78 |
|
|
[QUOTE = individual] The height of 175/65/14 is 58.31 cm, the rolling distance is 183.26 cm The height of 185/55/15 is 58.45 cm and the rolling distance is 183.7 cm. For 206, 195/45/15 is the wrong choice. Its height is 55.65 cm. Its rolling distance is 174.9 cm. It has 5% margin and the tire is 3 cm smaller. Individual how did you calculate this calculator heat but I still couldn't find the size of 58.31cm
|
|
| 08.05.2020 14:15 | # 12 |
 serverumut |
|
|
It should not be forgotten that the shape of the scheme will look very good and the die rim tire should not be attached ... Then the Km indicator shows incorrectly. We have rim-latic ranges available to know them :) After long researches in me; 195-55-15 maybe 195-50-15 or 195-45-16 I will get 195-55 (50) -15, which will not tire when I consider that my car is HDI and has 95hp power (chip process) :)
|
|
| 08.05.2020 14:15 | # 13 |
 Guests |
|
|
Descriptive of the indicative is very accurate. I agree exactly. According to the head, the tire sidewall is not made 50 or 55. it has a comprehensive account. In it the easiest to www.lastik24.co I can make the wheels were in las account. If you are twisting the rim in order to keep the tire cap fixed, the sidewall should be narrowed so that the total cap does not change. If you keep the cheek same and slide the rim, there will be a very wrong choice. There is also one more thing we need to know. the tire affects the cap at the base width. For example, 185/55/15 tires and 195/55/15 tires have different sides, therefore the sidewall height is different. The door of 195 is bigger at the height of the cheek. It would be even bigger if it was 205. The situation is based on water technical information. The part called 185 is the size of the base in mm. The so-called 55 knows the cheek height as a percentage. side cheek height means 55% of the base size. The last 15 digits are already known as the rim cap. There is one more thing I need to add without forgetting. If it is the rim change, it is necessary to take the values such as rim width and offset range carefully. |
|
| 08.05.2020 14:15 | # 14 |
 simsiyah |
|
|
I installed 195x50x15 rims in my car and I am very pleased that the rubber sidewalls thin tab is the only problem to be careful when entering the pits.
|
|