307 CC engine options preferred

I live in Izmir, I am 24 years old, I am planning to buy a peugeot 307 cc car towards the end of summer. I chose the cc model, the vehicle I will buy is clean, it is important for me, it is original from the first owner, not exceeding 80 thousand miles etc. my only decision is the engine options of the vehicle 1.5 ton and 1.6 110 hp manual 2.0 automatic 140 hp and 2.0 manual 180 hp in the engine options for me. performance does not matter much I am looking at a vehicle that is more of a pleasure. Is there a lot of fuel difference between these engine options? Which engine would you prefer? thanks everyone good forums the furkan_ka 2014-03-19 15:02:22

2.0 is a truly incredible machine with 180 hp power, but 1.6 is more economical, it is a problem that can be repaired and cheaper if it causes problems. I think I would get 2.0 with everything, but if you say I don't have performance, 1.6 will satisfy a normal user as well.

Also, 2000 engine flour tax is higher, which may be one of the reasons to choose 1.6 for you. tolga.onal 2014-03-19 15:06:44

[QUOTE = tolga.onal] Also, 2000 motor flour tax is higher, which may be one of the reasons to choose 1.6 for you [/ QUOTE]

Although my 307 is 1180 kg, if it burns 25 cents with LPG, it does not seem appropriate for 307cc to burn 27 cents with 1500 kilos weight. tolga.onal 2014-03-19 15:14:06

2004 2005 model for ccs that i am looking
Between 7-11 years 1600 cc tax 375 tl 2000 cc tax 1000 tl

[QUOTE = tolga.onal] If my 307 burns 25 cents despite 1180 kg, with LPG, it seems that 307cc burns 27 cents at 1500 kilos [/ QUOTE]

No, it has 1.6 lpg but there is more than 300 kg weight difference between normal 307 and cc, so it is not possible to burn 27 cents. If my 1200-pound car is burning 25 cents, it is hard to burn 27 cents for a 1,500-pound car in calm use.

It didn't make any sense to me. 2 advertisers sent a message. Someone said that they burned 25 cents at 2.0 180 hp manual cc for 27 cents per lpg 1.6 110 hp manual.

Subject current friends I am waiting for the experiences of cc owners about their motor preference

I have my brother, my brother, I have 1.6 cc. 2005 model calm me in the city. On the long way to Istanbul, lit 21 krs of calm usage. According to 1.6 2.0, it is very advantageous, 2.0 can also have a tube problem. If you look at the ads, the average 2.0s are cheaper than 1.6s. As far as performance, it does not cause much problems. On the Narlidere highway in the tupte, I climbed up to 215 km, it is even better in petrol;)

first of all, if you find it clean, tired, get it from it. I think 1.6 for 1.5 vehicles with cc .1.5 tonnes may be inadequate. As a result, you want a sports vehicle.

Thanks for the answers, the vehicles with 2.0 180 hp manual burn between 30-32 cents per km. but when you think of the difference in fuel, after finding the cleaner, if you want to choose between 1.6 2.0 2.0 180 hp manual makes more sense, there is not much difference

my vehicle 2.0 136 hp in city 11 lt lpg long road 8.5 lt fuel value of course these are in quiet use. 1.6 automated and 2.0 manual test data in the booklet the same 1.6 and no difference between them elsoberano 2014-03-21 13:03:21

Thanks for the answer, if your friends will buy 307 cc, performance and tax are not important, clean vehicles can be bought. There is not much difference between them. I will evaluate my preference in this direction.