![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
270 km with 50 TL diesel |
• Homepage » PEUGEOT MODELS (FAULTS AND SOLUTIONS) » 307 |
08.05.2020 16:28 | # 1 |
![]() |
|
|
08.05.2020 16:28 | # 2 |
![]() |
|
Although multijets are 1.3, they cannot easily drop below 6.5 liters per 100km. Although ours is 2.0, multijet & nbsp; it burns less fuel. It is the most economical engine amongst diesel dies. Moreover, multijet engine & nbsp; HDI cannot give performance of the engine. It does not satisfy me multijet. Your fuel consumption value is quite good. |
08.05.2020 16:28 | # 3 |
![]() |
|
[QUOTE = eserxxx] Hello friends, I have a 2.07 307 tool. I always buy fuel from Opet and 50 TL. I reset the mileage each time, and the result always varies between 270-290 km in urban use. My record is 305 km. Whom I ask it says great, how do you think ?? Meanwhile, while researching a piece recently, I entered the forum of grande punto players. Everyone tells us that they are going ballad by driving a 1.3 multijet car for 50 TL for 200 km. [/ QUOTE] is a very good fuel consumption, I can not fall down by 1.4 hdi and 20 krş. There is no traffic & nbsp; lamp on the roads you go.
|
08.05.2020 16:28 | # 4 |
![]() |
|
The fuel of your vehicle is very good. I realized that the important thing is to keep the foot steady in the gas or use the cruise control continuously.
|
08.05.2020 16:28 | # 5 |
![]() |
|
If the vehicle is used with constant acceleration, drink fuel like water On the long road, I fix it to 95. About 2000-2100 rpm & nbsp; I travel 1000 km with 55 liters of fuel. But if I don't fix it, if I press 130-140 then & nbsp; 900 but it does. When the speed exceeds 110, it burns 25% more fuel. More fuel to beat the wind resistance. I would like you to know that: After 80 km, the wind resistance will increase. starts and 90% of engine power is used to overcome wind resistance. & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; Reviews & nbsp; Member |
08.05.2020 16:28 | # 6 |
![]() |
|
You need to get a 307 now.
|
08.05.2020 16:28 | # 7 |
![]() |
|
[QUOTE = AhMeT®] You need to get a 307 immediately. [/ QUOTE] why
![]() |
08.05.2020 16:28 | # 8 |
![]() |
|
My record is out of town 40 tlye 218km & nbsp; |
08.05.2020 16:28 | # 9 |
![]() |
|
In my opinion, how are you going in aga & nbsp; |
08.05.2020 16:28 | # 10 |
![]() |
|
I do not want to accuse anyone, I can not say anything if it is a long way, even if the 2 liter diesel engine is the most comfortable in the city traffic, I can not fall under those values ... I personally could not fall below 4.8 / 100 km even on the long road with 1.6 110 diesel. & Nbsp; If my friend is a test pilot of brands or something, I would say amenna otherwise, account error
|
08.05.2020 16:28 | # 11 |
![]() |
|
[QUOTE = Three Hundred Six] My record is out of town 40 tlye 218km & nbsp; Stopped Lpg Is this worth with?
|
08.05.2020 16:28 | # 12 |
![]() |
|
I am catching this result on lpg and on the long road.
|
08.05.2020 16:28 | # 13 |
![]() |
|
Can you think you are on the gas & nbsp; |
08.05.2020 16:28 | # 14 |
![]() |
|
brother i do what you say with gasoline bea) 1.4 is aceba
|
08.05.2020 16:28 | # 15 |
![]() |
|
If you're burning 18 kr out of town, super nal & nbsp; |
08.05.2020 16:28 | # 16 |
![]() |
|
Yes 2.0 HDI spends less fuel than the engine volume. If you do not press it. If you ask why, the horsepower is lower than the engine's volume. Will 2.0 liter turbo diesel engine be 90 Hp? I think it should be at least 130 Hp. There is even 150 Hp. But when this happens, fuel consumption is increasing too much. In terms of fuel consumption, I think we should look at the power produced by the engine rather than the engine volume. So 2.0 HDI & nbsp; We can say that the fuel consumption of 1.6 HDI 110 Hp with 90 Hp engine is close. In one, the engine volume is high, but the power is low. 1.6 HDI, the engine volume is low, the power is high. In short, 2.0 HDI also reduced engine power and reduced fuel consumption. I think this way. |
08.05.2020 16:28 | # 17 |
![]() |
|
Okay, if I can burn it, I do not believe that it will burn the 2.0 hdi 16 hr in the city. = "Big smile" /> |
08.05.2020 16:28 | # 18 |
![]() |
|
Exactly & nbsp; |
08.05.2020 16:28 | # 19 |
![]() |
|
When I calculate mine is average & nbsp; It burns 24 cents. If you say why the 307 can burn less than the partner with the same engine, we can say that the aerodynamic structure of the 307 is different, that is, the wind resistance is lower. 16 cents is not possible. The stone crack does not fall below 20 cents. It also varies according to the weight of this vehicle. Partner adventure empty unladen weight 1350 kg. & Nbsp; 307 2.0 HDI & nbsp; 1260 kg. |
08.05.2020 16:28 | # 20 |
![]() |
|
In my city, I think the effect of wind resistance neither will have much effect, the extraterrestrial pattern makes my skin noticeable. 90km / h when wind resistance is going inside, stop inside the city, get up |