2007 307 sw 1.6 hdi 110 fuel - 307

Hello friends

4 people with full luggage.
The fuel consumption of my lion in 212 thousand between Ankara and Bursa is very convenient.
trip computer showed 4.2 lt.

my range was 1300, even up to 1430, 90-100.

I went to 110-120 between Bursa and Balıkesir.
When I filled the warehouse to 575 km, when I divided it to 20 kurus, a super figure appeared.

In Balıkesir ankara transformation, I returned an average of 130-150 km and my computer showed 6.5 lt.
I completed 5.3 liters in a total round trip of about 1500 km.
As a result, when diesel is 3.81 TL

20 cents from 90 to 100.

I burned 27-30 cents between 130-150
I went to an average of 25 cents.

If I had 6 forward gears I would burn less on the turn Smile

nice but I burned less in lpg of course as a fee, I made 570 km with 100 lira, it makes 17.5 cents. not like racing Big smile

[QUOTE = Efe-Pöjo] is nice, but I burned less at lpg. Of course, I made 570 km with 100 lira, making 17.5 cents. not like racing Big smile

[/ QUOTE]

yes, the price can compete in lpg, but the turbo diesel comes as a power to this fuel Big smile

I can not say anything to him correctly, I think that the turbocharged on the ramp is superior so that there is no need for discussion, but it does not matter much on the straight road. 4.2 very good value for a 110 car.

Well, the values are very good. I have a question how many kilometers do you have in the city with a warehouse

When comparing 207 and 307 sw, it should not be forgotten that there is a difference of about 300kg. Wink

In addition, there is a 200cc difference in the engine. It is certain that there is a serious performance difference not only on the ramp but also on the straight road. I think we could say that there was no difference on the straight road compared to the 1.6 gasoline.

I burned 4.8 without annoying with an average of 92 km between Istanbul and Izmir. I think it can fall below 4 if it contracts a lot. However, the values are very good for the sw and the inside weight. Clap

[QUOTE = Canberk35] When comparing 207 and 307 sw, it should not be forgotten that there is about 300kg difference. Wink

[/ QUOTE]

If 307 sw is 1594 kg, yes I say 300 kg in between. Do not worry, there is no serious performance difference on the straight road. We had 110 flunence diesel, I say it with reference.

thanks friends.
I burn 6-7 liters in the city.

[QUOTE = Efe-Pöjo] [QUOTE = Canberk35] When comparing 207 and 307 sw, it should not be forgotten that there is about 300kg difference. Wink

[/ QUOTE]

If 307 sw is 1594 kg, yes I say 300 kg in between. Do not worry, there is no serious performance difference on the straight road. We had 110 flunence diesel, I say it with reference.

[/ QUOTE]

I wrote based on the weights written in the catalog. It appears as 207 1148kg in the catalog. On the other hand, 307 sw is 1402. 207 and it is not logical for me to have 1.3 tons with a 1.4 lt gasoline engine. Still, you are the owner. If you say 1.3 tons, it is true. All I can say is that it was too heavy for its dimensions. :)

As performance, I said that 207 is 1.4 hp 75hp. I think it is possible to say that there is a noticeable difference even though it is 90hp. I used both 90 and 110 hp versions of the 307 1.6 hdi. I think there is a distinct power difference between the two vehicles.

yes, I think it's not normal to be this heavy, but I add the original catalog data below. In addition, the first bet position was that gasoline and turbodiesels of equal power gave the same performance on the straight track.

[QUOTE = Faruk] hello friends

4 people with full luggage.
The fuel consumption of my lion in 212 thousand between Ankara and Bursa is very convenient.
trip computer showed 4.2 lt.

my range was 1300, even up to 1430, 90-100.

I went to 110-120 between Bursa and Balıkesir.
When I filled the warehouse to 575 km, when I divided it to 20 kurus, a super figure appeared.

20 cents from 90 to 100.

I burned 27-30 cents between 130-150
I went to an average of 25 cents.

If I had 6 forward gears I would burn less on the turn Smile

[/ QUOTE]

2.8 instant consumption? If it is 6 forward there will be no change in fuel consumption, but the average speed will change.

[QUOTE = SDYMZ] [QUOTE = Farouk]

[/ QUOTE]

2.8 instant consumption? If it is 6 forward there will be no change in fuel consumption, but the average speed will change.

[/ QUOTE]

Burned 2.8 to 90-100 instant teacher.
On the turn, he lit 6 liters at 120-130.
I mean, 6 gears wouldn't burn 6 liters.
as you say.
after that i will go between 90-100 because i am in the radar with bozüyük te 126 in the dark Smile

I pressed it because there is no radar at night, but it did.

08.05.2020 19:08	# 3
Faruk
[QUOTE = Efe-Pöjo] is nice, but I burned less at lpg. Of course, I made 570 km with 100 lira, making 17.5 cents. not like racing [/ QUOTE] yes, the price can compete in lpg, but the turbo diesel comes as a power to this fuel

08.05.2020 19:08	# 4
Efe-Pojo
I can not say anything to him correctly, I think that the turbocharged on the ramp is superior so that there is no need for discussion, but it does not matter much on the straight road. 4.2 very good value for a 110 car.

08.05.2020 19:08	# 5
xmen
Well, the values are very good. I have a question how many kilometers do you have in the city with a warehouse

08.05.2020 19:08	# 6
Canberk35
When comparing 207 and 307 sw, it should not be forgotten that there is a difference of about 300kg. In addition, there is a 200cc difference in the engine. It is certain that there is a serious performance difference not only on the ramp but also on the straight road. I think we could say that there was no difference on the straight road compared to the 1.6 gasoline. I burned 4.8 without annoying with an average of 92 km between Istanbul and Izmir. I think it can fall below 4 if it contracts a lot. However, the values are very good for the sw and the inside weight.

08.05.2020 19:08	# 7
Efe-Pojo
[QUOTE = Canberk35] When comparing 207 and 307 sw, it should not be forgotten that there is about 300kg difference. In addition, there is a 200cc difference in the engine. It is certain that there is a serious performance difference not only on the ramp but also on the straight road. I think we could say that there was no difference on the straight road compared to the 1.6 gasoline. I burned 4.8 without annoying with an average of 92 km between Istanbul and Izmir. I think it can fall below 4 if it contracts a lot. However, the values are very good for the sw and the inside weight. [/ QUOTE] If 307 sw is 1594 kg, yes I say 300 kg in between. Do not worry, there is no serious performance difference on the straight road. We had 110 flunence diesel, I say it with reference.

	2007 307 sw 1.6 hdi 110 fuel
• Homepage » PEUGEOT MODELS (FAULTS AND SOLUTIONS) » 307

08.05.2020 19:08	# 1
Faruk
Hello friends 4 people with full luggage. The fuel consumption of my lion in 212 thousand between Ankara and Bursa is very convenient. trip computer showed 4.2 lt. my range was 1300, even up to 1430, 90-100. I went to 110-120 between Bursa and Balıkesir. When I filled the warehouse to 575 km, when I divided it to 20 kurus, a super figure appeared. In Balıkesir ankara transformation, I returned an average of 130-150 km and my computer showed 6.5 lt. I completed 5.3 liters in a total round trip of about 1500 km. As a result, when diesel is 3.81 TL 20 cents from 90 to 100. I burned 27-30 cents between 130-150 I went to an average of 25 cents. If I had 6 forward gears I would burn less on the turn

08.05.2020 19:08	# 10
Efe-Pojo
yes, I think it's not normal to be this heavy, but I add the original catalog data below. In addition, the first bet position was that gasoline and turbodiesels of equal power gave the same performance on the straight track.

08.05.2020 19:08	# 11
SDYMZ
[QUOTE = Faruk] hello friends 4 people with full luggage. The fuel consumption of my lion in 212 thousand between Ankara and Bursa is very convenient. trip computer showed 4.2 lt. my range was 1300, even up to 1430, 90-100. I went to 110-120 between Bursa and Balıkesir. When I filled the warehouse to 575 km, when I divided it to 20 kurus, a super figure appeared. In Balıkesir ankara transformation, I returned an average of 130-150 km and my computer showed 6.5 lt. I completed 5.3 liters in a total round trip of about 1500 km. As a result, when diesel is 3.81 TL 20 cents from 90 to 100. I burned 27-30 cents between 130-150 I went to an average of 25 cents. If I had 6 forward gears I would burn less on the turn [/ QUOTE] 2.8 instant consumption? If it is 6 forward there will be no change in fuel consumption, but the average speed will change.

08.05.2020 19:08	# 12
Faruk
[QUOTE = SDYMZ] [QUOTE = Farouk] [/ QUOTE] 2.8 instant consumption? If it is 6 forward there will be no change in fuel consumption, but the average speed will change. [/ QUOTE] Burned 2.8 to 90-100 instant teacher. On the turn, he lit 6 liters at 120-130. I mean, 6 gears wouldn't burn 6 liters. as you say. after that i will go between 90-100 because i am in the radar with bozüyük te 126 in the dark I pressed it because there is no radar at night, but it did.